Regarding religion and the state in Arizona, which statement is true?

The correct response reflects a fundamental principle of the relationship between religion and the state, specifically within the context of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes the framework for ensuring the separation of church and state. While the statement that "Religion is completely separated from the state" may seem absolute, it oversimplifies the nuanced understanding of this relationship in practice.

The principle that "The state may not favor one religion over another" emphasizes the importance of governmental neutrality in religious matters. This ensures that the government does not promote, prefer, or discriminate against any specific religion. This aligns with the Establishment Clause, which prohibits any law respecting an establishment of religion.

By acknowledging both of these principles, the chosen answer accurately captures the essence of the legal and social landscape regarding religion and the state in Arizona, as well as across the United States. Although religious influence may exist in various societal contexts, the state itself must remain neutral and cannot impose religious beliefs or favor one faith over another. Thus, the recognition that the state has a duty to impartially engage with multiple religions reinforces the validity of the answer chosen.